Contact Us
Editorial corrections and updates
When a review on this website contains a factual error, a dated bonus figure, or a payment method that has changed, the editorial team takes the report directly. The fastest way to flag outdated information is to send a message that names the specific page and the exact detail that no longer matches what the operator currently offers. Each submission is checked against the operator’s own published terms before any change is made to the review.
Corrections that affect a rating or a recommendation get a second pass by a different editor. That second check exists because a single outdated RTP figure or a wagering requirement that has been raised can change the entire verdict on a casino. The goal is to keep every review accurate enough that a player can act on it without a separate fact-check.
What the editorial team can answer
Questions about how a bonus works, what a wagering term means, or whether a withdrawal method is typical for the market are within the editorial remit. The same applies to requests for clarification on how a review weighed a specific feature. Anything that concerns the operator’s own books — a pending cashout, a deposit that has not landed, a verification request, or an account suspension — belongs with Wildz support, not with this website.
Why account issues go to the operator
Account, deposit, and withdrawal problems involve personal data that this website never sees. No review editor can access a player’s transaction history, balance, or identity documents. Only the operator holds those records, and only the operator can act on them. Sending such a query here adds a step without adding any authority to resolve it. The editorial team can explain the usual procedure for a complaint, but the actual fix happens on the operator’s side.
For matters that involve responsible gambling, the operator’s own support channels handle self-exclusion and deposit limits directly. This website can point to the general tools that such operators typically offer, but it cannot set, change, or cancel any limit on a player’s behalf.
Submitting a correction
Reports of outdated information are handled on a rolling basis. Every message is read, and anything that points to a verifiable error is treated with priority. The editorial team does not remove negative findings simply because an operator objects; the record is corrected only when the facts change. If a review is challenged, both the original claim and the operator’s response are weighed against the evidence before any edit is made.